What Do You Mean We Don't Have Goals?: Media Neglect of Occupy's Anti-Foreclosure Work

Curator's Note

The Occupy Wall Street movement is commonly criticized for having unclear goals and an incoherent message. Mainstream media outlets often frame the self-proclaimed 99% as a chaotic, leaderless mess that lacks real political potential. This is not surprising, given that many of the Occupy members who are interviewed reflect similar sentiments. These critiques from a broad political spectrum are understandable since many of the original organizers are dedicated to anarchist principles that are assumed to uphold decentralization over legitimate organizing.

However, this type of press coverage fails to account for various segments of the Occupy movement that do have concrete goals. This video from the Minneapolis grassroots media justice organization, The Uptake, interviews one of the local organizers about Occupy MN’s mission to occupy foreclosed homes. As he explains, this move acts as both a strategic symbolic demand to defend working class homeowners over banks, and also as a pragmatic method of sustaining protest throughout the winter.

On November 8, I participated in the first residential occupation in Minnesota, which took place at Monique White’s foreclosed house in North Minneapolis. In grand Minnesota tradition, the weather was already bitterly cold, and the group of about 60 supporters was prepared with gloves and determination. Large spray-painted bed sheets with messages like “US Bank Stop Foreclosures” and “Had Enough?” covered the windows of the two-story home, and when Monique’s living room was full with sleeping bags, remaining protesters set up tents in her yard. At 5pm, an organized rally began, with speakers including Monique, a representative from SEIU, and neighborhood high school students offering personal stories of hardship and powerful calls for justice. The only camera to be found was that of an Occupy organizer’s laptop computer.

Two hours later, after both the rally and the ensuing march were over, the local FOX News station van showed up. The lack of coverage can’t be blamed on the news’ propensity for the “sensational”; occupying a home with signs, chants, and tents is an inarguable spectacle. So what deters the media from focusing on actions that are proving wrong the claims that Occupy-ers are nothing but goalless troublemakers? Mainstream media have never been good at disseminating nuance; perhaps it is too much for these outlets to acknowledge that the movement is complicated: both clear and unclear, both organized and messy, both politically weak and politically necessary. 



Hi Raechel

Thanks for this thoughtful post. I also find it interesting that this rally, which had so many participants that some people had to set up tents outside, did not get much press coverage. Has there been any coverage of other local events?

I really like the point you make at the end your note -- that perhaps the lack of coverage is related to how difficult it is to conceptualize what is going on with the various manifestations of the Occupy movements. It seems that these movements are taking different forms, depending on where they are located and what that particular community needs. In Minneapolis, the focus seems to be foreclosures coupled with the prospect of a cold winter.

Looking forward to the discussions this week.

Add new comment

Log in or register to add a comment.