Curator's Note
How are we to live in a world that is cruelly indifferent? Unmoored from anthropogenic certainty the reader of Cormac McCarthy's The Road is challenged to decide how to create ethical sense. There are no people in The Road, we are told by the old man, and there are no gods, “Where men cant (sic) live gods fare no better.” This is a world of ash. So too was the world of Confucius, an itinerant scholar, who aspired to be the advisor to a great kingdom during the chaotic, gruesome Warring States Period. He spent his years traveling and teaching how a person (ren 人) could become authoritative in their conduct (ren 仁): by doing one's utmost to cultivate their identity-forming relationships in the human community. He never attained the high position he sought. His later years were filled with death: his only son died, as did two of his favorite students. The Road suggests itself, surprisingly, to be a Confucian allegory.
Central to this allegory is the term dao (道), conventionally translated as “the way.” Dao is a pervasive and widely discussed philosophical concept in Chinese culture. As such it has many other meanings consonant with “path”—such as teaching, heading, method—and the term comes to mean the “way to live,” the “way the cosmos operates,” etc. The dao that Confucius promotes involves a focus on filial obligations and a robust appreciation and elaboration of human culture. But the Confucian "path" is not toward some final destination, the way never ends, and it never began. So too we see in McCarthy's novel, “Ive (sic) always been on the road.” The old man tells the man and child at the campfire. Despite the profusion of road images in Confucianism, it is a way with no crossroads. One either collapses somewhere along the way or one goes crooked, lost to the wilderness. There is no choice to be made, only feats of moral strength. Just as the man tells the boy that the fire is with them, so too we have within us the capacity to harmonize the differences between us. The road one travels with Confucius is the way of consummate personhood (rendao 仁道), a route to establish a flourishing human community. Perhaps there are no people (ren 人) in The Road because personhood is an achievement cultivated in reciprocating relationships among those we encounter on the road.
Comments
Spot on
A colleague and I are currently working on a manuscript about illness narratives. Particularly, we are interested in how the media we consume effects how we, and others, conceptualize illness. A majority of Hollywood film likes to see discourses as closed. One has an illness, one overcomes the illness, film ends. However, in the narratives we have analyzed, illness is not that simple. 95% of people who go through an abdominal surgery suffer from brutal adhesions, although they are rarely informed of this. The philosophy of this film seems to adjust one's conception of trials, tribulations. Truth is precarious, but is ultimately a co-construction, embedded in mutual appreciation. Really loved this piece.
i agree - really like your
i agree - really like your note! ... however, i would be curious if and how the film goes beyond an illustration of an external philosophical concept, i.e., does the film come up with a 'thought' of its own?
Interesting Piece
The note is really interesting in juxtaposition with the trailer. I'm not very familiar with Confucianism, but I wonder if you might read the film/book as having a tension between Eastern and Western philosophy? The scene where the main character shoots the guy trying to kidnap his son seems like a place to flesh out that part of the narrative. While the main character may be looking for a Confucian-style community, the world around him and his family emerges as the primary hurdle to achieving it. In addition to Confucianism, you might look at the Wabi Sabi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wabi-sabi) aesthetic in the presentation of the narrative...
Add new comment